Aristide en taule livrera ses amis à la justice dit W Street

The Haiti File

MARY ANASTASIA O'GRADY

A government file pertinent to two civil law suits alleging bribery doesn't just get up and walk out of a supposedly secure federal-agency record room in Washington. When said bribery allegations involve politically influential individuals on both sides of the aisle and a notoriously corrupt former Haitian president that the U.S. supported for a decade, it's even more troubling.

In a December email to a lawyer in one of the law suits, the Federal Communications Commission said that its "Haiti file" was missing. The file is the record of which U.S. telecom companies that did business with the government of former Haitian President Jean Bertrand Aristide actually complied with U.S. law by submitting their contracts to the FCC. An official at the commission told me on Friday that "we don't have the file but we are continuing our active efforts to locate it."

I'm not sure whether the missing file would fit into Sandy Berger's socks.

But given the number of political heavyweightsboth Republican and Democratwho might welcome the disappearance of these documents, it's a bit difficult to write the whole thing off as an accident.

Since 2000 I have followed allegations that Haiti's Mr. Aristide took bribes from U.S. telecom carriers doing business in his country. These charges arose first in conversations with Haitians familiar with operations at the state-owned phone company, Teleco. More recently they have been aired in two separate civil suits filed in two different U.S. federal courts.

The alleged quid pro quo for the U.S. companies that agreed to pay the bribes was access to the Teleco network at rates below the uniform "international settlement rate" set by the FCC. During the course of my investigations, two different long-distance suppliers told me that Teleco officials offered them just such a special rate in exchange for payment made to specially designated accounts.

If the allegations are true, it would mean that the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act was violated, right under the nose of the FCC and the Department of Justice, during Democratic and Republican administrations. It would also mean that while Haitians were placing their trust in Uncle Sam to help them construct a democracy, millions of dollars that might have gone to building an infrastructure were siphoned off by a corrupt tyrant and U.S.

business partners with friends in high places.

In 2000, questions arose about Fusion Telecommunications, which had a concession to terminate calls in Haiti and which, according to sources, had an office inside Teleco. Marvin Rosen (finance chairman for the Democratic National Committee from September 1995 until January 1997), former Democratic Congressman Joseph P. Kennedy II, and Bill Clinton confidante Thomas (Mack) McLarty III were all on the board of Fusion. Mr. Rosen was Fusion chief executive officer.

Rumors abounded in Haiti that Fusion had a sweetheart deal with Mr. Aristide that gave the U.S. firm rates well below the international settlement rate.

When I inquired about the company's Haiti business while preparing a Jan.

2001 op-ed, I was immediately referred to a company lawyer who refused to either confirm or deny that the company was even doing business in Haiti. In September 2005, Fusion told me it had always filed what was required at the FCC and denied making any illegal payments to Teleco.

In 2001 Mr. Kennedy's office released a statement that he had no "joint venture, partnership or business arrangement with the president of Haiti or for that matter, anyone in Haiti" and that he was not involved in running Fusion. Nevertheless, in a Feb. 7, 2001 op-ed in the Boston Globe, he wrote, "I was proud to help bring more than $1 million in private investment from Fusion into Haiti." That was peanuts when you consider that Teleco once had annual revenues upwards of $60 million. By the time Mr. Aristide was forced into exile by a political uprising in 2004, the company was losing money.

The whole thing might have been swept under the rug if it weren't for Michael Jewett, who in 2003 had been an employee at New Jersey-based IDT, headed by former Republican congressman Jim Courter. Like Fusion, IDT had a number of seasoned politicos on its board.

In March 2004 Mr. Jewett filed suit in federal court in Newark, N.J.

alleging that he was fired from IDT because he objected to an illegal deal between the company and Mr. Aristide. Mr. Jewett's allegations seem to echo the charges swirling around Fusion. IDT responded much like Fusion, insisting that its arrangement with Haiti Teleco was a trade secret. In fact, IDT had a legal obligation to make its arrangement public and the information was unsealed, revealing that IDT had been granted a rate of nine cents per minute versus the FCC mandated rate of 23 cents. Mr. Jewett also claims in court documents that IDT agreed to make payments to an offshore account in Turks and Caicos called "Mount Salem," ("Mont Salem" in French)

for the benefit of Mr. Aristide.

After Mr. Aristide was driven from power in February 2004, the interim government pried open Teleco's books and alleged that the company had been looted. In November 2005 it filed suit in U.S. district court in southern Florida. "The fraudulent scheme to steal Teleco revenues was carried out in part through defendant Mont Salem," the government claimed, adding that, "At Aristide's direction, Inevil, Duperval and Beliard [Haitian nationals] directed at least two of the Class B carriers, IDT and Skytel, to make their payments for Teleco's services to Mont Salem. At Aristide's direction, Teleco's then-counsel also caused Teleco to request at least one other Class B carrier, Fusion, to make payments through Mont Salem."

Mr. Jewett's case has already revealed a lot, but it won't tell Haitians where millions of dollars in lost Teleco revenues went throughout the 1990s.

That will require a more thorough airing, such as the civil suit Haiti filed in Florida. Unfortunately, Haiti has had to withdraw its suit for lack of funds. Its request for a share of assets forfeited by Haitian drug kingpins which could be used to reinstate the suit and pay legal feeshas been resisted by the DOJ. First DOJ said it couldn't release the assets because the cases were on appeal. Now it says that it doesn't yet have the forfeited assets.

Another way to get at the truth would be if DOJ used the mountain of evidence it seems to be sitting on to indict Mr. Aristide, since he has often asserted that he won't remain silent about his dealings with highly placed American politicians if he is brought to trial. Why the DOJ would turn down an offer like that is a mystery, a little like the missing file.

American politicians, Democrats and Republicans are afraid that former president of Haiti Jean-Bertrand Aristide will talk and give details about bribes they received from him

Rico1 a écrit:

The Haiti File

MARY ANASTASIA O'GRADY

A government file pertinent to two civil law suits alleging bribery doesn't just get up and walk out of a supposedly secure federal-agency record room in Washington. When said bribery allegations involve politically influential individuals on both sides of the aisle and a notoriously corrupt former Haitian president that the U.S. supported for a decade, it's even more troubling.

In a December email to a lawyer in one of the law suits, the Federal Communications Commission said that its "Haiti file" was missing. The file is the record of which U.S. telecom companies that did business with the government of former Haitian President Jean Bertrand Aristide actually complied with U.S. law by submitting their contracts to the FCC. An official at the commission told me on Friday that "we don't have the file but we are continuing our active efforts to locate it."

I'm not sure whether the missing file would fit into Sandy Berger's socks.

But given the number of political heavyweightsboth Republican and Democratwho might welcome the disappearance of these documents, it's a bit difficult to write the whole thing off as an accident.

Since 2000 I have followed allegations that Haiti's Mr. Aristide took bribes from U.S. telecom carriers doing business in his country. These charges arose first in conversations with Haitians familiar with operations at the state-owned phone company, Teleco. More recently they have been aired in two separate civil suits filed in two different U.S. federal courts.

The alleged quid pro quo for the U.S. companies that agreed to pay the bribes was access to the Teleco network at rates below the uniform "international settlement rate" set by the FCC. During the course of my investigations, two different long-distance suppliers told me that Teleco officials offered them just such a special rate in exchange for payment made to specially designated accounts.

If the allegations are true, it would mean that the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act was violated, right under the nose of the FCC and the Department of Justice, during Democratic and Republican administrations. It would also mean that while Haitians were placing their trust in Uncle Sam to help them construct a democracy, millions of dollars that might have gone to building an infrastructure were siphoned off by a corrupt tyrant and U.S.

business partners with friends in high places.

In 2000, questions arose about Fusion Telecommunications, which had a concession to terminate calls in Haiti and which, according to sources, had an office inside Teleco. Marvin Rosen (finance chairman for the Democratic National Committee from September 1995 until January 1997), former Democratic Congressman Joseph P. Kennedy II, and Bill Clinton confidante Thomas (Mack) McLarty III were all on the board of Fusion. Mr. Rosen was Fusion chief executive officer.

Rumors abounded in Haiti that Fusion had a sweetheart deal with Mr. Aristide that gave the U.S. firm rates well below the international settlement rate.

When I inquired about the company's Haiti business while preparing a Jan.

2001 op-ed, I was immediately referred to a company lawyer who refused to either confirm or deny that the company was even doing business in Haiti. In September 2005, Fusion told me it had always filed what was required at the FCC and denied making any illegal payments to Teleco.

In 2001 Mr. Kennedy's office released a statement that he had no "joint venture, partnership or business arrangement with the president of Haiti or for that matter, anyone in Haiti" and that he was not involved in running Fusion. Nevertheless, in a Feb. 7, 2001 op-ed in the Boston Globe, he wrote, "I was proud to help bring more than $1 million in private investment from Fusion into Haiti." That was peanuts when you consider that Teleco once had annual revenues upwards of $60 million. By the time Mr. Aristide was forced into exile by a political uprising in 2004, the company was losing money.

The whole thing might have been swept under the rug if it weren't for Michael Jewett, who in 2003 had been an employee at New Jersey-based IDT, headed by former Republican congressman Jim Courter. Like Fusion, IDT had a number of seasoned politicos on its board.

In March 2004 Mr. Jewett filed suit in federal court in Newark, N.J.

alleging that he was fired from IDT because he objected to an illegal deal between the company and Mr. Aristide. Mr. Jewett's allegations seem to echo the charges swirling around Fusion. IDT responded much like Fusion, insisting that its arrangement with Haiti Teleco was a trade secret. In fact, IDT had a legal obligation to make its arrangement public and the information was unsealed, revealing that IDT had been granted a rate of nine cents per minute versus the FCC mandated rate of 23 cents. Mr. Jewett also claims in court documents that IDT agreed to make payments to an offshore account in Turks and Caicos called "Mount Salem," ("Mont Salem" in French)

for the benefit of Mr. Aristide.

After Mr. Aristide was driven from power in February 2004, the interim government pried open Teleco's books and alleged that the company had been looted. In November 2005 it filed suit in U.S. district court in southern Florida. "The fraudulent scheme to steal Teleco revenues was carried out in part through defendant Mont Salem," the government claimed, adding that, "At Aristide's direction, Inevil, Duperval and Beliard [Haitian nationals] directed at least two of the Class B carriers, IDT and Skytel, to make their payments for Teleco's services to Mont Salem. At Aristide's direction, Teleco's then-counsel also caused Teleco to request at least one other Class B carrier, Fusion, to make payments through Mont Salem."

Mr. Jewett's case has already revealed a lot, but it won't tell Haitians where millions of dollars in lost Teleco revenues went throughout the 1990s.

That will require a more thorough airing, such as the civil suit Haiti filed in Florida. Unfortunately, Haiti has had to withdraw its suit for lack of funds. Its request for a share of assets forfeited by Haitian drug kingpins which could be used to reinstate the suit and pay legal feeshas been resisted by the DOJ. First DOJ said it couldn't release the assets because the cases were on appeal. Now it says that it doesn't yet have the forfeited assets.

Another way to get at the truth would be if DOJ used the mountain of evidence it seems to be sitting on to indict Mr. Aristide, since he has often asserted that he won't remain silent about his dealings with highly placed American politicians if he is brought to trial. Why the DOJ would turn down an offer like that is a mystery, a little like the missing file.

American politicians, Democrats and Republicans are afraid that former president of Haiti Jean-Bertrand Aristide will talk and give details about bribes they received from him

[b]Rico,

Vous habitez au Canada,je crois;peut ètre que vous ne savez pas comment on considère les opinions éditoriales du Wall Street Journal.
WSJ est un excellent journal financier,je dis financier,mais ses éditorriaux sont considérés comme des "Loony Tunes" des "crazies"
Personne de conséquence ,ne les prend au sérieux.
Anastasia O'Grady est la plus folle de tous ,on a cessé de l'inviter dans les "opinion show" à la radio et la télévision.
Cet article doit faire plus peur aux extrème droitistes haitiens que de les réconforter,peut ètre que O Grady et ses pareils ont vent qu'il il y a un programme de réhabilitation d'Aristide dans l'air ,donc elle se met à l'attaque.
Il faut considérer que les opinions émies envers Aristide dans les journaux américains sont de plus en plus positives .
N'oublions pas que les Démocrates sont revenus au timon et avec une victoire écrasante et le controle des deux Chambres et de la Présidence qui s'annonce en 2008,O'Grady revient à la charge.

Et puis il n'y a rien de nouveau dans les accusations de O Grady ,au sujet de la Teleco.Elle fait ces accusations depuis environ 2000.

D'OU ANGUILLE SOUS ROCHE DANS LE DOSSIER DE LA SOCABANK

Une autre hypothèse pourquoi la O'grady reviendrait à la charge sur cette affaire de téléphone est que les Démocrates vont faire des "hearings" sur la situation haitienne,avant les élections de 2008.
Ce serait une occasion pour donner unoeil au beurre noir à l'administration Bush,question de faire savoir à la population que Bush a descendu son pantalon dans tous les dossiers d'Affaires étrangères.
Surtout la mégère O'Grady a aussi accusé des congressmen Républicains car,dans un hearing à la Chambre certains Républicains surtout ceux qui restent dans le Nordet le Midwest voteraient avec les Démocrates,question de protéger leur derrière

Mezanmi,li atik COUNTREPUNCH sa a.
Se yon analiz repotay MICHAEL DEIBERT ki te korespondan yon pakèt jounal Ameriken.
Counterpunch diseke dezenfòmasyon DEIBERT.
Mwen konnen lDeibert li ak ekri Kreyòl trè byen .
misye konn entèvni sou Sit Ayisyen yo.
Monchè yo kenbe w vre.

Counterpunch rele atik lan :(AK DEZENFOMASYON) kOUMAN YO Fè YON Pè TOUNEN YON KANIBAL:

HOW TO TURN A PRIEST INTO A CANNIBAL

http://counterpunch.org/barahona02032007.html